• To: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@m...>
• Subject: Re: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint
• From: jcowan@r...
• Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:43:52 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E528B28B0@R...>
• References: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E528B28B0@R...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Joshua Allen scripsit:

> Not to spiral too quickly off-topic, but I wanted to point out that
> Sapir-Whorf has been thoroughly discredited,

By no means.  Certain strong forms have been discredited, but no SW supporter
ever believed them anyway.

> and although it [...] lends an air of mysterious
> authority to persons like Chomsky; 

Which persons like Chomsky did you have in mind?  Not Noam himself, who
seems to hold (incorrectly IMO) that UG is incompatible with SW.

-- 
You let them out again, Old Man Willow!                 John Cowan
What you be a-thinking of?  You should not be waking!   jcowan@r...
Eat earth!  Dig deep!  Drink water!  Go to sleep!       www.reutershealth.com
Bombadil is talking.                                    www.ccil.org/~cowan

• References:
  • RE: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint
    • From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint
• Next by Date: RE: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint
• Previous by thread: RE: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint
• Next by thread: RE: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread