• To: "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Hierarchies, bullets, graphs, relations ... was Re: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint
• From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 22:17:13 +0100
• In-reply-to: <01650F4C-2F3B-11D8-AED8-000A95CCC59E@x...>
• References: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E528B1EF9@R...> <01650F4C-2F3B-11D8-AED8-000A95CCC59E@x...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

Michael Champion wrote:
> Good taxonomies 
> today (thinking of SNOMED) are usually based on centuries of research 
> and, ahem, often cost serious money.

Though one. I was going to propose to our management to work on
a corporate taxonomy, in order to leverage topic maps and perhaps
even OWL for - strawman ahead - intranet searches. The real targets
are of course data mappings for EAI. I hope they don't read the
partially quoted message.

J.Pietschmann

• References:
  • RE: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint
    • From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
  • Hierarchies, bullets, graphs, relations ... was Re: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint
    • From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint
• Next by Date: Re: Generating Trees from XML Schema
• Previous by thread: Hierarchies, bullets, graphs, relations ... was Re: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint
• Next by thread: RE: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread