• To: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>, XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Why XML Schema is so large
• From: Manos Batsis <mbatsis@n...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 11:40:52 +0200
• In-reply-to: <200312220922.hBM9MmYj070723@a...>
• References: <200312220922.hBM9MmYj070723@a...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b)Gecko/20031208

David Tolpin wrote:
> What does 'a technology is complex' mean?

Quite often, it means no abstractions (i.e. tools)that effectively make 
the technology easier to use are available. However, sometimes the crown 
   of complexity is based on a comparison to another technology with 
similar goals ;-)

 > And error corrections
> don't add clarity (usually), they sacrifice clarity for the sake of unambiguity.

True, but there's no true interoperability without unambiguity.

Happy holidays,

Manos

• References:
  • Re: Why XML Schema is so large
    • From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why XML Schema is so large
• Next by Date: RE: Why XML Schema is so large
• Previous by thread: Re: Why XML Schema is so large
• Next by thread: RE: Why XML Schema is so large
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread