• To: <michael.h.kay@n...>,"David Tolpin" <dvd@d...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Why XML Schema is so large
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:54:28 -0800
• Thread-index: AcPIfJ0EZ+ECbJ1jQOy2CGp96AThJgANMu0w
• Thread-topic: Why XML Schema is so large

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael Kay [mailto:michael.h.kay@n...] 
>Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 3:13 AM
>To: 'David Tolpin'; xml-dev@l...
>Subject: RE:  Why XML Schema is so large
>
>I don't think complexity and bugginess are necessarily 
>related. Schema Part 1 is far more complex than part 2, but 
>far less buggy.

Surely you jest? I assume that this opinion comes from the fact that you
work on XQuery which pays significant attention to the datatypes of part
2 but doesn't have to interact much with part 1. 

--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
To err is human but when the eraser wears out before the pencil, you're
carrying things too far.


This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.  

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath predicate and context
• Next by Date: RE: XPath predicate and context
• Previous by thread: xml editor to design forms
• Next by thread: raw storage about NXD
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread