• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: patterns and restrictions
• From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>
• Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 21:53:24 +0400 (AMT)
• In-reply-to: <3FE0942F.20002@e...>

> > So, does 'pattern' restrict lexical space of the type it is applied to,
> > or defines it anew?
> 
> It restricts it, a valid instance of a type will already have to match 
> the type the pattern is applied to before matching the pattern itself.
> 

Fine, it is what the original poster, who asked the question, wanted to know,
and what I tried to confirm by quoting the spec. Do you think that the quote
answers the question?

If not, what exactly in the specification suggests it is so?

David Tolpin
http://davidashen.net/

• References:
  • Re: patterns and restrictions
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: patterns and restrictions
• Next by Date: Re: DTD and Schema Teasers
• Previous by thread: Re: patterns and restrictions
• Next by thread: Re: patterns and restrictions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread