• To: <cowan@m...>
• Subject: RE: RE: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data heads?
• From: <Ari.Nordstrom@s...>
• Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 09:07:12 +0100
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcO7Bsj0pDLXkRQkTMO6EsM1X5lAYg==
• Thread-topic: RE: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data heads?

John Cowan wrote...
> Ari.Nordstrom@s... scripsit:
> 
> > I'm a dochead, and the answer's simple for me. XSD is way 
> too complex
> > to write, and it has some annoying shortcomings. I'd go 
> with DTDs (and
> > so far, my clients do, too) but if we absolutely must have something
> > else, then Relax NG seems far more accessible.
> 
> DTDs are just a third syntax for RELAX NG.  :-)


Ah, that explains it. :-)
Docheads, unite!

/Ari

• Prev by Date: RE: DOCTYPE used in an XML Schema
• Next by Date: RE: Expert's advice needed about XML Schema and definin g some kind of relation
• Previous by thread: RE: When Empty is Everything
• Next by thread: RE: Expert's advice needed about XML Schema and definin g some kind of relation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread