• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Subject: Re: regex for element or attr name
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:31:42 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3FCB2C2F.8020401@a...>
• References: <3FCAEC5F.80808@o...> <3FCB2C2F.8020401@a...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Rick Jelliffe scripsit:

> (Actually, I don't know why #xHHHH is used here: it would be better to
> use U+HHHH to emphasize that these are characters not codes in the
> external encoding.)

I wasn't about to make a gratuitous change to XML 1.1 to fix this, and
I suspect that XML 1.0 used #xHHHH because that most closely corresponds
to XML's own notation &#xHHHH; without actually being confusable with it.

In any case, as you say, #xHHHH(H) refers to characters, not encodings.

-- 
Even a refrigerator can conform to the XML      John Cowan
Infoset, as long as it has a door sticker       jcowan@r...
saying "No information items inside".           http://www.reutershealth.com
        --Eve Maler                             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: regex for element or attr name
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • RE: regex for element or attr name
    • From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>

• References:
  • regex for element or attr name
    • From: Ramkumar Menon <ram.menon@o...>
  • Re: regex for element or attr name
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: regex for element or attr name
• Next by Date: Small Problem
• Previous by thread: Re: regex for element or attr name
• Next by thread: RE: regex for element or attr name
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread