• To: "'Berend de Boer'" <berend@x...>
• Subject: RE: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data heads?
• From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>
• Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 14:13:56 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

I'm not sure which you're referring to by "it" there--do you use RNG or XSD
for everything?

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: Berend de Boer [mailto:berend@x...]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 1:25 PM
To: DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)
Cc: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data
heads?


>>>>> "DuCharme," == DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) <bob.ducharme@l...>
writes:

    DuCharme,> I saw someone (don't remember who) make the
    DuCharme,> generalization recently that RELAX NG is gaining in
    DuCharme,> popularity with people doing XML work with irregularly
    DuCharme,> structured documents that would end up being published
    DuCharme,> in some medium or other (the "doc heads"), and that W3C
    DuCharme,> Schemas are more entrenched with the XML developers
    DuCharme,> doing systems involved in more transactional processes
    DuCharme,> such as web services and database interaction ("data
    DuCharme,> heads"). Does anyone strongly agree or disagree with
    DuCharme,> this?

strongly disagree. I use it for everything.

-- 
Regards,

Berend. (-:

• Prev by Date: RE: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data heads?
• Next by Date: Re: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data heads?
• Previous by thread: RE: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data heads?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread