• To: Ari.Nordstrom@s...
• Subject: Re: RE: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data heads?
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 08:33:05 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <03Dec3.084647cet.334081@f...>
• References: <03Dec3.084647cet.334081@f...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Ari.Nordstrom@s... scripsit:

> I'm a dochead, and the answer's simple for me. XSD is way too complex
> to write, and it has some annoying shortcomings. I'd go with DTDs (and
> so far, my clients do, too) but if we absolutely must have something
> else, then Relax NG seems far more accessible.

DTDs are just a third syntax for RELAX NG.  :-)

-- 
John Cowan      jcowan@r...        http://www.reutershealth.com
        "Not to know The Smiths is not to know K.X.U."  --K.X.U.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• References:
  • RE: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data heads?
    • From: <Ari.Nordstrom@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Strange Sorting Problem
• Next by Date: Re: Strange Sorting Problem
• Previous by thread: RE: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data heads?
• Next by thread: Re: RE: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread