• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: RDF syntax
• From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>
• Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 18:05:16 -0500
• In-reply-to: <r02000200-1028-76723BCF0D8511D8A92B0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <1067812092.5888.157.camel@delleric><r02000200-1028-76723BCF0D8511D8A92B0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• Sender: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>

Simon St.Laurent writes:

 > Unfortunately, the "XML family" suffers mightily from #2 at this point,
 > so it's hardly like the magic X makes it immune from obfuscation.  Now
 > that SGML looks simpler than XML, maybe...

I'll take it you chose not to spend time with the other specs from the
SGML family, like HyTime.


All the best,


David

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RDF syntax
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: RDF syntax
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: RDF syntax
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDF syntax
• Next by Date: Re: RDF syntax
• Previous by thread: Re: RDF syntax
• Next by thread: Re: RDF syntax
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread