• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Question
• From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:05:02 -0800
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311251358510.1455-100000@e...>
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311251358510.1455-100000@e...>

Betty Harvey wrote:

> The reality is that most organizations are using [W3C XML] schema's
> for all "new" projects.  The U.S. Government recommends
> the use of W3C Schemas [...]
> [...]
> My initial question is still unanswered - which W3C schema can I trust to
> validate a schema (I will take 95%)?  Right now I don't have confidence in
> any of the schema parsers.  I want a parser that provides me the same
> amount of confidence that I have in James Clark NSGMLS.


Sounds to me like you have intractably conflicting requirements.



--Joe English

  jenglish@f...

• References:
  • Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XMLSchema Question
    • From: Betty Harvey <harvey@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Question
• Next by Date: RE: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XMLSchema Question
• Previous by thread: Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Question
• Next by thread: Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread