• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Re: XML and a text editor, barefoot in the winter, uphill both ways [...]
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:14:19 -0500
• In-reply-to: <03Nov19.111638cet.334082@f...>

Ari.Nordstrom@s... writes:
>Just out of curiosity: Does O'Reilly (still?) accept TeX as input
>format? And what about LaTeX? I tend to use Linux as much as I can but
>there's (IMHO) no good XML editor available for it, so I use LyX for
>most of my (Linux-based) writing.

I don't believe we've taken TeX for years, though it comes up
occasionally.  

>> I suspect that if there were a WYSIWYG DocBook editor with revision
>> marks, my co-workers would be happier about XML.  From my
perspective,
>> Topologi's Markup Editor is quite beautifully sufficient.  (It was a
>> tremendous help during the editing of our upcoming RELAX NG book.)
>
>Your upcoming RELAX NG book? When?

It should be out near the end of December, though given the holidays, it
may be January before bookstores have it in stock.

• References:
  • RE: Re: XML and a text editor, barefoot in the winter, uphill both ways [...]
    • From: <Ari.Nordstrom@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: XML and a text editor, barefoot in the winter,uphill both ways [...]
• Next by Date: Two mistakes found in XML 1.1 Proposed Recommendation
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: XML and a text editor, barefoot in the winter,uphill both ways [...]
• Next by thread: RE: Re: XML and a text editor, barefoot in the winter,uphill both ways [...]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread