• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Word 2003 schemas available
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:34:31 -0500
• In-reply-to: <Pine.SOL.4.33.0311180855310.6786-100000@p...>

mani@C... (Murali Mani) writes:

>thanks, and interesting. Actually I noticed that Word -> XML eating up
>disk, which is very true for large word documents (we ignored that
>point in previous emails).

Odd.  The only times I've noticed XML files being much larger than .doc
files was when they contained pictures or other data Word treats as
binary - and then reports as @#X! Base 64.

Generally I've found my Word XML files to be close to their .doc
equivalents, and sometimes even smaller.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Word 2003 schemas available
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• References:
  • RE: Word 2003 schemas available
    • From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Word 2003 schemas available
• Next by Date: Re: Word 2003 schemas available
• Previous by thread: RE: Word 2003 schemas available
• Next by thread: Re: Word 2003 schemas available
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread