• To: "'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <clbullar@i...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
• From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:04:53 -0500
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9EFAD@h...>
• Reply-to: <bob@w...>

Claude L Bullard wrote:
> If XAML only runs on the MS desktop, and is not 
> an on-the-wire format, ok.
	Microsoft's Longhorn help files say that BAML is "optimized
for download". That sure sounds like "on-the-wire"...

		bob wyman

• References:
  • RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
• Next by Date: RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
• Previous by thread: RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
• Next by thread: RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread