• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• From: Oleg Dulin <dulino@o...>
• Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 07:25:04 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r02000200-1028-07E550910F0E11D892650003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <r02000200-1028-07E550910F0E11D892650003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

> On the bright side, they also seem to have discarded W3C XML Schema in
> favor of WinFS, probably because there wasn't a "straightforward way to
> adapt those technologies to Microsoft's purpose."

No, that is most likely because XML Schema is confusing and requires 
eletrical circuit diagrams to explain how certain things work 
(http://www.olegdulin.com/archives/000017.html , excuse my sarcasm) . I 
haven't seem WinFS but my guess is that it is probably much simpler to 
use than Schema and does not require a B.Sc. in EE and Masters in Comp. Sci.

Oleg


> 
> That one I can sympathize with.
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
> 
> 

• References:
  • RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Next by Date: Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed...
• Previous by thread: RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Next by thread: Re: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread