• To: 'Clayton Cottingham' <drfrog@t...>, 'Jeff Sonstein' <jeffs@a...>
• Subject: RE: [www-vrml] x3d-3.0.dtd validation errors
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:24:50 -0600
• Cc: 'X3D/VRML list' <www-vrml@w...>, xml-dev@l...

The problem isn't fixing the bug.  It is defining 
the problem so one knows if it is a bug.  In other 
words, interpreting the spec.

len


From: Clayton Cottingham [mailto:drfrog@t...]

well in the case of opensource xml engines et al
its easy enough to contact the author, in fact, they are usually eternally
grateful
for bug reports

• Prev by Date: RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
• Next by Date: Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XMLSchema Question
• Previous by thread: RE: [www-vrml] x3d-3.0.dtd validation errors
• Next by thread: RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread