• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
• From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:32:40 -0800

Nevermind... I'm imagining ghosts. All those problems still exist with plain
text anyhow.
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Lowery [mailto:Jeff.Lowery@c...] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 1:06 PM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: RE:  Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
> 
> Okay, I understand all that. As I'm sure has been pointed out 
> before: don't
> the benefits binary coding diminish somewhat in heterogeneous 
> environment
> where one has to worry about byte-ordering, bit-encoding of 
> primitives, etc?
> Don't you then push off latency to the protocol layer or the client
> application itself?
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
> 

• Prev by Date: RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
• Next by Date: Re: Updating document with SAX
• Previous by thread: Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
• Next by thread: Re: When is the XML PI <?xml?> required ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread