• To: bob@w...
• Subject: Re: Word 2003 schemas available
• From: Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@t...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 19:11:58 +0200
• Cc: "'Murali Mani'" <mani@C...>, "'Michael Kay'" <michael.h.kay@n...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <000801c3adf0$99c64510$650aa8c0@BOBDEV>
• Organization: Multiconn Technologies
• References: <000801c3adf0$99c64510$650aa8c0@BOBDEV>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

Bob Wyman wrote:

> 	I must say that I'm very concerned about the impact that Word
> documents in XML are going to have on the whole "XML movement." While
> people have grumbled about XML's size for a long time, most people
> haven't been exposed to the elephantine monsters that result when you
> convert Word to XML. 

I believe that's completely imaginary problem. WordprocessingML file 
seems to be not bigger than native Word2003 doc file, I just saved 138Kb 
doc into XML and got 150Kb WordprocessingML file. Even more - using 
default namespace can save yet another 10-20% of space.
And I don't heard anobody complaining about size of doc files.
-- 
Oleg Tkachenko
http://www.tkachenko.com/blog
Multiconn Technologies, Israel

• References:
  • RE: Word 2003 schemas available
    • From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Word 2003 schemas available
• Next by Date: Re: Word 2003 schemas available
• Previous by thread: RE: Word 2003 schemas available
• Next by thread: Re: Word 2003 schemas available
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread