• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents
• From: "Ed Day" <eday@o...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:29:17 -0500
• References: <000601c3b30d$e4e25210$21f7fea9@aldebaran>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
To: "'Bob Foster'" <bob@o...>
Cc: <bob@w...>; <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 11:37 PM
Subject: RE:  RE :  Comparison of Xml documents


>
> Bob Foster wrote:
> >
> > On another point, you have said a couple of times that ASN.1 doesn't
> > provide anything like XSD's 'all'.
>

I have had a hard time following the deep theory going on in this thread.
From a practical standpoint, an ASN.1 SET construct is roughly equivalent to
an <xsd:all>.  Both allow the elements defined within to be transmitted in
any order.

Regards,

Ed Day
Objective Systems, Inc.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• References:
  • RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents
    • From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Question
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XMLSchema Question
• Previous by thread: RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents
• Next by thread: Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread