• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Production 78 / Process failure in XML 1.1
• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:24:00 GMT
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <3FB100B8.80603@a...>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

In article <3FB100B8.80603@a...> you write:

>I know of people still using serial terminals (perhaps with Xon/Xoff.) 

This will only be an issue if you send the XML file straight down the
wire to the terminal.  In which case you can't send XML files without
checking them first anyway, because any encoding that uses byte values
that don't correspond to plain characters is going to cause trouble.

-- Richard

• References:
  • Re: Re: Production 78 / Process failure in XML 1.1
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Getting the value of ancestor node in a for-each loop
• Next by Date: RE: Getting the value of ancestor node in a for-each loop
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Production 78 / Process failure in XML 1.1
• Next by thread: RE: Reusing, Refactoring, Reinventing??? (was Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread