[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Monday, Nov 3, 2003, at 11:08 America/Detroit, Bob Wyman wrote: > > Complete commercial implementations are available, it would be > hard to justify their cost if they weren't. The difference is that the > commercial projects are addressing the needs of hundreds of projects > which represent enough variety in their requirements that a full ASN.1 > implementation is needed to satisfy them all. Also, since people are > paying money for the stuff, they tend to complain louder and expect > rapid response whenever it is found that something that they need from > an ASN.1 standard is not implemented properly in the commercial tool. > Sounds like SGML circa 1996! Maybe it's time for a serious refactoring of ASN.1 to find the 80/20 point in there. Maybe ASN.2 could be to ASN.1 what XML is to SGML.
|

Cart



