[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Saturday, Nov 1, 2003, at 20:20 America/Detroit, Simon St.Laurent wrote: > If some aspect of ASN.1 can cover mixed content and open content > models, > I'm happy to welcome it to my regular list of XML schema languages. > Otherwise, I'll be happy to continue promoting ASN.1 as an > _alternative_ > to XML, albeit one with ASN.1->XML->ASN.1 interoperability. Yup, you said clearly what I was stumbling to say. > > > I also wish there were open source tools for ASN.1 that just reported > the contents of an ASN.1 message, more like the open-ended approach > that > XML parsers have generally taken. > Trouble is, you can't make sense of an ASN.1 message without having the schema, and I mean the EXACT schema, used to generate it. That's (oops, smell of impending flames <grin>) the value proposition for XML in a nutshell, IMHO, and why it is used in all those projects Simon mentioned where ASN.1 is, on paper, better suited.
|

Cart



