RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...

Shopping cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:37:34 -0800

I'm sure this has been asked before, but I missed it:

What can be achieved by binary XML that can't be similarly achieved using well-known text compression algorithms?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
- RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
- Why not just zip the XML? [was the MS FUD thread]
  - From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>

Prev by Date: Re: Updating document with SAX
Next by Date: Re: Updating document with SAX
Previous by thread: RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
Next by thread: Why not just zip the XML? [was the MS FUD thread]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks

W3C Member