• To: Alessandro Triglia <sandro@m...>
• Subject: Re: Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 16:51:17 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <001001c3a544$29f69190$b894c044@aldebaran>
• Organization: Expway
• References: <001001c3a544$29f69190$b894c044@aldebaran>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3

Alessandro Triglia wrote:
> The same limitation exists in XML Schema.  If I am not mistaken, even in
> RELAX NG (where it is possible to specify a choice between an element and an
> attribute), you still need to include both in the pattern (so they aren't
> really the *same* component).

I don't think RNG has a notion of component identity though, so stating 
whether they are the same or not might not be meaningful. If you needed 
that information, you could convey it using an annotation.

In Schematron of course you could simply <assert test='foo|@foo'>...

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
Research Scientist, Expway      http://expway.com/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

• References:
  • RE: Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those list s!)and Binary XML not needed
    • From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those list s!)and Binary XML not needed
• Next by Date: RE: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!) and Binary XML not needed...
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those list s!)and Binary XML not needed
• Next by thread: [ANN] xmloperator 3.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread