• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: Re: XML Binary Interchange Workshop - minutes available
• From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
• Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:54:53 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D119311F@R...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D119311F@R...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:43:46AM -0800, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> [Dare Obasanjo] I haven't reviewed the minutes yet but it seems
> contradctory to state that more research is needed before specifications
> can be created then go ahead and recommend a working group.

The recommendation from the Workshop was that a WG be chartered to
produce test data, collect use cases and identify requirements.

However, creating of a Working Group within the W3C is subject to
a vote of the Advisory Committee -- every member gets a vote.

> Personally I think this is unsettling but will withold further comment
> until I've had a chance to read the minutes and all the position papers.

Something to consider is that the Working Group, if formed, could
produce a conclusion that W3Cshould not specify a binary format for
interchange of XML.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/

• References:
  • RE: XML Binary Interchange Workshop - minutes available
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed...
• Next by Date: Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!) andBinary XML not needed...
• Previous by thread: RE: XML Binary Interchange Workshop - minutes available
• Next by thread: Re: XML Binary Interchange Workshop - minutes available
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread