• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: standard vs. implementation tools for XQuery
• From: Waraporn Jirapanthong <aj406@s...>
• Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 16:41:10 +0000
• In-reply-to: <20031113195113.GD14584@w...>
• References: <1068751705.3fb3db59d87b7@f...> <20031113195113.GD14584@w...>
• User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2

Quoting Liam Quin <liam@w...>:

> Can you give a simple example?  I've used doc() more than once
> in the same query with Lucents Galax, for example (obviously
> giving a different URI each time for it to be useful).
> 

Quoting Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>:
> Are you saying the tools you are using do not support the doc() function at 
> all, or place restrictions on its use? Can you give me more information?
>

What I mean is that a tool I try supports *doc()* while another one does
*document()*. However, I would follow the standard of W3C for syntax of quiry.

Additionally, how about joining? has anyone concerning joining elements between
two more XML-based documents? (compared with SQL e.g. inner-join, outer-join)
Be honest, I couldn't find this stuff on the lastest draft of XQuery yet.

Thank you indeed for any suggestion of yours. 

Waraporn


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: standard vs. implementation tools for XQuery
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• References:
  • standard vs. implementation tools for XQuery
    • From: Waraporn Jirapanthong <aj406@s...>
  • Re: standard vs. implementation tools for XQuery
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Inside Redhell: Microsoft XAML Blogger Round-Up
• Next by Date: [Announce] dbXML 2.0 Open Source Again (GPL)
• Previous by thread: Re: standard vs. implementation tools for XQuery
• Next by thread: RE: standard vs. implementation tools for XQuery
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread