• To: "Betty Harvey" <harvey@e...>,"Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@m...>
• Subject: RE: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Question
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:42:41 -0800
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcOzg26jeLJi9bzCQZycKd6WWXujagAAHmfy
• Thread-topic: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Question

It depends do you mean that it validates according to the rules at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/ or the rules at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/ + http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata ?

________________________________

From: Betty Harvey [mailto:harvey@e...]
Sent: Tue 11/25/2003 11:26 AM
To: Elliotte Rusty Harold
Cc: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re:  XML Schema Question



My initial question is still unanswered - which W3C schema can I trust to
validate a schema (I will take 95%)?  Right now I don't have confidence in
any of the schema parsers.  I want a parser that provides me the same
amount of confidence that I have in James Clark NSGMLS.

Betty

• Prev by Date: Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XMLSchema Question
• Next by Date: Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XMLSchema Question
• Previous by thread: RE: Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
• Next by thread: RE: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XML Schema Question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread