• Subject: Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 00:26:02 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3FC15800.4060405@a...>
• References: <004201c3af99$e9944010$650aa8c0@BOBDEV> <3FBDAFDA.3010905@a...> <3FBDF386.9090307@a...> <20031121.121152.50253888.Tony.Graham@S...> <3FBE14D8.7040405@a...> <p06010201bbe4835029d4@[192.168.254.4]> <3FC15800.4060405@a...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3

Rick Jelliffe wrote:

> ...nor "kangaroo" in books on US 
> quasi-extra-terratorial
> military legal practise (though maybe it should).
> 

Hmm, "kangaroo court" may come to mind ...


Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
    • From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
  • Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
    • From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
  • Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
    • From: Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@S...>
  • Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
    • From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
  • Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: [offtopic] Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
• Next by Date: Off topic - Korean language
• Previous by thread: Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
• Next by thread: Re: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread