• To: <michael.h.kay@n...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: standard vs. implementation tools for XQuery
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 22:12:41 -0500
• In-reply-to: <000c01c3aa36$9d0e93c0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• References: <000c01c3aa36$9d0e93c0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>

At 10:36 PM +0000 11/13/03, Michael Kay wrote:
>Products do have trouble keeping up with the changing specs, but Saxon
>7.8, released yesterday, is pretty much up to date with the XQuery draft
>also published yesterday. The main only significant thing that it
>doesn't support is schema import.
>

Reading the documentation, it appears that Saxon accepts the query 
from the command line. This could be inconvenient for large, complex, 
multiline queries. Is there anyway to read the query from stdin or 
from a file?

I'm tempted to whip up a quick Swing GUI like Quip's, but I 
volunterred at the last minute to cover an XQiery presentation on 
Monday and I doubt I have time. :-(

-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   elharo@m...
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: standard vs. implementation tools for XQuery
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• References:
  • RE: standard vs. implementation tools for XQuery
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Inside Redhell: Microsoft XAML Blogger Round-Up
• Next by Date: Re: Inside Redhell: Microsoft XAML Blogger Round-Up
• Previous by thread: RE: standard vs. implementation tools for XQuery
• Next by thread: RE: standard vs. implementation tools for XQuery
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread