• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: Office (was RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML)
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 08:32:48 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r02000200-1028-F77115070F9011D892650003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <458062CF2CB9E9448A76CAA50445D4321005E5@h...> <r02000200-1028-F77115070F9011D892650003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> (Unless, of course, you just want to buy a copy to convert your
> documents to WordML, then use XSLT or similar tools to convert it to a
> cleaner XML format that's more easily stored, processed, etc.  

In which case OpenOffice.org 1.1 is a win on every count: better price and
better XML better documented.  Run your documents through that instead.

-- 
XQuery Blueberry DOM                            John Cowan
Entity parser dot-com                           jcowan@r...
    Abstract schemata                           http://www.reutershealth.com
    XPointer errata                             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Infoset Unicode BOM                                 --Richard Tobin

• References:
  • RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
    • From: "Steve Boyce" <SteveB@h...>
  • Office (was RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Errata E57
• Next by Date: RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Previous by thread: Office (was RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML)
• Next by thread: RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread