• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 14:33:55 -0500
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9EEA6@h...>

clbullar@i... (Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes:
>Still, I'm awfully glad to see Microsoft stick their necks out this
>far. Guts and moxie are thrilling even if risky.  Too many vested
>companies won't take risks and MS seems to thrive on them.

The only risk they're taking with XAML is a backlash against their
arrogance in discarding things that are already out there, but not owned
by them.

I suppose that's a genuine risk, but not something they're likely to
lose sleep over.

• References:
  • Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!) and Binary XML not needed...
• Next by Date: RE: XML Training and Certification
• Previous by thread: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Next by thread: Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread