• To: Alessandro Triglia <sandro@m...>
• Subject: Re: RE : Comparison of Xml documents
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:32:05 -0500
• Cc: 'John Cowan' <cowan@m...>, 'Bob Wyman' <bob@w...>, 'Alaric B Snell' <alaric@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <001a01c3b327$ece7da60$21f7fea9@aldebaran>
• References: <001a01c3b327$ece7da60$21f7fea9@aldebaran>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

If the ASN.1 attaches an arbitrary order to an xs:all, then it's 
possible that it might receive XML in the exact opposite order that is 
in the ASN.1.  Or do I misunderstand?  If not, then you must be prepared 
to buffer the entire incoming xs:all content.  (Okay, I suppose you 
could convert to native form and just buffer that, but the point still 
holds.)

I'm not saying this is *bad,* I'm just trying to understand all the 
nooks and crannies.
	/r$
-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents
    • From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>

• References:
  • RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents
    • From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binaryXML...)
• Next by Date: date type validation with XML Schema
• Previous by thread: RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents
• Next by thread: RE: RE : Comparison of Xml documents
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread