• To: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
• Subject: Re: the yin/yang web, was: Re: xml schema and OWL
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 09:49:47 -0400
• Cc: leb27@d...,xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3F7A0C1F.60908@o...>
• References: <1272f711275e99.1275e991272f71@d...><6.0.0.22.2.20030930154224.01dc9c10@n...><3F7A0C1F.60908@o...>

At 07:05 PM 9/30/2003, Jonathan Borden wrote:
>Jonathan Robie wrote:
>
>>... XML Schema and OWL are not two parts of some integrated system, they 
>>live in largely separate universes.
>
>This article is a nice discussion of the issues: 
>http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/231/

I agree. In fact, so far, this is the best thing I have read on the 
relationship between the XML Web and the Semantic Web.

Jonathan 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: the yin/yang web, was: Re: xml schema and OWL
    • From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@b...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Managing Innovation
• Next by Date: RE: Looking for Schema for Requirements and Specifications Manual(s)
• Previous by thread: RE: More on ontolgies and/or PageRank (tm)
• Next by thread: Re: Re: the yin/yang web, was: Re: xml schema and OWL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread