• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Microsoft Hypes Up XUL As The Greatest Expiriment S ince Adam And Eve
• From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 09:49:25 -0500
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9EE31@h...>

On Wednesday, Oct 29, 2003, at 09:23 America/Detroit, Bullard, Claude L 
(Len) wrote:
> co.
>
> It is the performance of the mush of different XML
> languages and objects that would make me wince.  One
> has to ask, why do this in XML at all.
>

I've been wondering that myself.  Isn't the whole point of XML 
portability (or interoperability) across platforms, at the price of 
"bloated" data and "inefficient" performance?  That's usually a good 
tradeoff, but not if you stay in a proprietary box.

I guess it lets MS leverage all the other XML stuff they do, basically 
to support "interoperability" across the various components, teams, 
etc. 
  

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Microsoft Hypes Up XUL As The Greatest Expiriment Since Adam And Eve
    • From: Mike Kozlowski <mlk@k...>
  • RE: Microsoft Hypes Up XUL As The Greatest Expiriment S ince Adam And Eve
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
  • Re: Microsoft Hypes Up XUL As The Greatest Expiriment Since Adam And Eve
    • From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>

• References:
  • RE: Microsoft Hypes Up XUL As The Greatest Expiriment Since Adam And Eve
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: [Slight Correction] Re: InfoPath Digital Signature controversy?
• Next by Date: Re: Microsoft Hypes Up XUL As The Greatest Expiriment Since Adam And Eve
• Previous by thread: RE: Microsoft Hypes Up XUL As The Greatest Expiriment S ince Adam And Eve
• Next by thread: Re: Microsoft Hypes Up XUL As The Greatest Expiriment Since Adam And Eve
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread