• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:19:30 +0100 (BST)
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <3F955AE4.5000609@d...>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>Ah, I thought removing one of the last needs for DTD was reason enough.

I should have been clearer about that.  The underlying motivation is
the need for scoped (or arbitrarily-introducable) entities; the
suggested solution is "natural" in that it fits in with the gradual
replacement of DTDs.

-- Richard

• References:
  • Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
• Next by Date: RE: +names--
• Previous by thread: Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
• Next by thread: Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread