• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWo rking Group
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:31:05 -0400
• In-reply-to: <4827EC373E03DB44AC2AB3900430896B6723DC@c...>

At 10:19 AM 10/10/2003 -0700, Jeff Lowery wrote:
>Doesn't this just change the problem from defining all possible types to one
>of defining all possible facets? Is that really any easier?

I think it depends on what level of interoperability you want to enforce.

• References:
  • RE: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWorking Group
    • From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWorking Group
• Next by Date: Re: Help for finding root node from XML Schema
• Previous by thread: RE: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWorking Group
• Next by thread: RE: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWorking Group
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread