Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
elharo@m... (Elliotte Rusty Harold) writes: >Hmm. To me it looks like XAML is considerably better designed than >XUL. This is very much like the difference between SVG and XSL-FO >that I wrote about in Item 11 of Effective XML, Make structure >explicit through markup. XUL is using a double syntax with embedded >CSS. Hmm. I thought Microsoft looked stupid for integrating presentation information directly with the markup rather than accepting what I see as a much more manageable CSS-based approach. Oh well. Guess they weren't going to please everyone anyway, and it's obvious from their other formats that they've really never had a clue what to do with CSS, despite it's having been the original differentiator between IE and Netscape.
|
