• To: Tyler Close <tyler@w...>
• Subject: Re: syntax, model
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 11:07:11 -0400
• Cc: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <E1AD2En-0001I5-00@canteen> tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55
• References: <r02000200-1028-7845750605A911D888600003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <E1ACrp5-0001Bh-00@canteen> <p06002000bbbecadb5785@[192.168.254.4]> <E1AD2En-0001I5-00@canteen> tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

> "How exactly does the thing described by a schema differ
> from a data model?"

A schema can describe what the data looks like; it doesn't have to 
describe values.  Even W3C XML Schema got this right -- there's a reason 
why the standard is in two pieces.
	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: syntax, model
    • From: Tyler Close <tyler@w...>

• References:
  • Re: syntax, model
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: syntax, model
    • From: Tyler Close <tyler@w...>
  • Re: syntax, model
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: syntax, model
    • From: Tyler Close <tyler@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: syntax, model
• Next by Date: Re: syntax, model
• Previous by thread: Re: syntax, model
• Next by thread: Re: syntax, model
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread