• To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Subject: Re: Is google a conceptual graph engine?
• From: Benjamin Franz <snowhare@n...>
• Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 11:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3F81A9A6.2000501@e...>

On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Robin Berjon wrote:

> Benjamin Franz wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Murali Mani wrote:
> >>Note; Can someone seen any case when even page rank can be fooled? I do
> >>not remember having seen anything..
> > 
> > 
> > Sure. I saw a case this morning where several porn sites showed up on the
> > first page of a clearly unrelated Google search.
> 
> What, and you don't give us the keywords you used?

Sorry. It was a link in a current Slashdot story comment on Google 
behaving strange - and I didn't write down the search terms they used and 
can't find the specific comment.

-- 
Jerry

Gauss's law is always true, but it is not always useful.
    -- David J. Griffiths, "Introduction to Electrodynamics"

• Prev by Date: Re: Is google a conceptual graph engine?
• Next by Date: Re: Is google a conceptual graph engine?
• Previous by thread: XML and Access databases
• Next by thread: How to expat 1.95.6 with Borland C++ 5.02?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread