[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 06:54 2003-10-25 -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote: >As a document validation language RNG is simpler, more >expressive and less verbose than W3C XML Schema. As a >datayping language W3C XML Schema is the only game in >town [...] Can you (or someone else) elaborate on this? I don't understand what features are missing från RNG as a "datatyping language" (what's that?). It has the existing datatypes from WXS, it has the ability to construct regex patterns, it has named patterns for complex types. What's not there? I think the day Microsoft turns to RNG will be a lucky day for XML. Gustaf
|

Cart



