• To: Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@S...>
• Subject: Re: UTF-8+names
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 16:34:26 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20031020.000707.19366645.Tony.Graham@S...>
• References: <20031019034635.91162.qmail@w...> <r02000200-1028-1CD20FB2024311D8B3120003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <20031020.000707.19366645.Tony.Graham@S...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

Tony Graham wrote:

> Yet the proposal under discussion doesn't attempt naming either 65,000
> characters or 1,000,000+, so I don't see why surrogates have anything
> to do with it.

Lauren did a rough back-of-the-envelope calculation and came up with 
about 2,000 characters. -Tim

• References:
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@S...>

• Prev by Date: Re: UTF-8+names
• Next by Date: Re: UTF-8+names
• Previous by thread: Re: UTF-8+names
• Next by thread: RE: UTF-8+names
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread