• To: <danny666@v...>,"'John Cowan'" <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: RE: About OWL syntax
• From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 09:39:58 -0400
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <BKELLDAGKABIOCHDFDBPEENGEBAA.danny666@v...>

Hi Danny,

Danny said:
An additional point is that OWL (and RDF) is essentially declarative, so
there isn't an procedural tie between classes and properties like goto. More
like ravioli than spaghetti.

Didier replies:
You are right it is not procedural. I was using the "goto effect" syndrome
from the usability perspective not from the process thread perspective. For
a machine, nothing is wrong about a goto. For a human being, it reduces
readability and therefore increases the probability of errors. This effect
has been documented - if my memory is good - by Ben Schnederman in his book
"software psychology" in 1980. Ravioli is the perfect image for a class
definition as done in several object oriented language.

Cheers
Didier PH Martin
http://didier-martin.com

• References:
  • RE: About OWL syntax
    • From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The Battle for Web Services
• Next by Date: RE: About OWL syntax
• Previous by thread: RE: About OWL syntax
• Next by thread: RE: About OWL syntax
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread