• To: Alessandro Triglia <sandro@m...>
• Subject: Re: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 07:23:51 -0700
• Cc: 'Tyler Close' <tyler@w...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <001901c389b8$c6183990$42a7c044@aldebaran>
• References: <001901c389b8$c6183990$42a7c044@aldebaran>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Alessandro Triglia wrote:

> Decoding ASN.1 BER/DER is not particularly difficult.  The procedure is
> specified in pages 10-37 of X.690 (*), which has been around for two
> decades.  If there are buggy implementations out there, they are not due to
> the alleged complexity of ASN.1, but to careless programming and superficial
> testing.

Empirically, though, when I have been faced with actual BER data, 
*ER-reading tools have been hard to find and of generally lousy quality. 
  This is not the case with XML tools.  Assuming you are correct about 
the difficulty, I assume this is a result of cultural and market rather 
than technical issues. -Tim

• References:
  • RE: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
    • From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>

• Prev by Date: For those who wanted to know the algorithm for checking maliciousschemas..
• Next by Date: RE: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
• Previous by thread: RE: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
• Next by thread: Ambiguous Content Models
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread