• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Microsoft Hypes Up XUL As The Greatest Expiriment S ince Adam And Eve
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 09:32:22 -0500
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9EE31@h...>

clbullar@i... (Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes:
>It is the performance of the mush of different XML 
>languages and objects that would make me wince.  One 
>has to ask, why do this in XML at all.

XML is good at providing a facade of openness to things which really
aren't open.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Microsoft Hypes Up XUL As The Greatest Expiriment S ince Adam And Eve
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>

• References:
  • RE: Microsoft Hypes Up XUL As The Greatest Expiriment Since Adam And Eve
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: InfoPath Digital Signature controversy?
• Next by Date: Re: InfoPath Digital Signature controversy?
• Previous by thread: RE: Microsoft Hypes Up XUL As The Greatest Expiriment Since Adam And Eve
• Next by thread: RE: Microsoft Hypes Up XUL As The Greatest Expiriment S ince Adam And Eve
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread