• To: Mike Champion <mc@x...>,Murali Mani <mani@C...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Is google a conceptual graph engine?
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 13:26:44 -0400
• In-reply-to: <20031006172216.20363.qmail@w...>
• References: <Pine.SOL.4.33.0310060854570.20596-100000@p...><20031006172216.20363.qmail@w...>

At 01:22 PM 10/6/2003, Mike Champion wrote:
>--- Murali Mani <mani@C...> wrote:
>
> > Main thing is: it is difficult to get your page
> > ranked highly by doing
> > tricks..
> >
> > Note; Can someone seen any case when even page rank
> > can be fooled? I do
> > not remember having seen anything..
>
>See http://www.google-watch.org/gaming.html

The above URL lists an example based on the search term 'french military 
victories'. My current favorite involves the phrase 'weapons of mass 
destruction'. Enter that into Google, with or without the quotes, and hit 
the "I'm feeling lucky" button.

Jonathan 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Is google a conceptual graph engine?
    • From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>

• References:
  • Re: Is google a conceptual graph engine?
    • From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
  • Re: Is google a conceptual graph engine?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is google a conceptual graph engine?
• Next by Date: Re: Is google a conceptual graph engine?
• Previous by thread: Re: Is google a conceptual graph engine?
• Next by thread: Re: Is google a conceptual graph engine?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread