• To: "Joe English" <jenglish@f...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: syntax, model
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:25:21 -0700
• Thread-index: AcOaazCZOGI2k2bXQ3+CnqORVHyBfwAEoWE5
• Thread-topic: syntax, model

And I'd rather have a spec written in prose than a schema any day of the week. 

________________________________

From: Joe English [mailto:jenglish@f...]
Sent: Fri 10/24/2003 1:11 PM
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  syntax, model



Now with sufficient intuition and guesswork, you can _probably_
write software that _usually_ works _most_ of the time if all
you have by way of a specification is a collection of sample
inputs.  Personally, I'd rather have a schema (RNC format,
if you please) and skip the guesswork.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: syntax, model
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Re: syntax, model
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • RE: syntax, model
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: syntax, model
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: syntax, model
• Next by Date: Re: syntax, model
• Previous by thread: RE: syntax, model
• Next by thread: Re: syntax, model
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread