• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: syntax, model
• From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
• Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 20:35:25 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r02000200-1028-7845750605A911D888600003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>

Simon St.Laurent wrote:

> jonathan@o... (Jonathan Borden) writes:
>> No! At least not in the case of RDF/OWL whose semantic models are
>> defined around the concepts of sets where shared semantics can be
>> defined as the intersection of any two or more party's semantics. That
>> is the whole point.
>
> Odd.  I don't think of semantics as something I want formalized to the
> point where I can calculate intersections.

I didn't mean to imply that you could *calculate* intersections. The 
intersection is the shared part, whatever is outside the intersection 
is your own private Idaho.

FWIW

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: syntax, model
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: syntax, model
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: syntax, model
• Next by Date: Re: syntax, model
• Previous by thread: Re: syntax, model
• Next by thread: Re: syntax, model
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread