• To: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Subject: Re: UTF-8+names
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 13:11:58 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200310192101.05193.miles@m...>
• References: <20031019034635.91162.qmail@w...> <3F92A169.60903@p...> <20031019171750.GI20059@m...> <200310192101.05193.miles@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

Miles Sabin wrote:

>   <?xml encoding&=;"UTF-8+names"?>
> 
> How would that get along with Appendix F style encoding detection?

Since there is no replacement named '&=;', this would be passed to the 
XML processor exactly as you see it there.  The XML processor would 
(correctly) throw it on the floor, because it's not well-formed. 
Where's the problem? -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• References:
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: xml, books
• Next by Date: Re: UTF-8+names
• Previous by thread: Re: UTF-8+names
• Next by thread: Re: UTF-8+names
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread