• To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Subject: Re: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML Schema WorkingGroup
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:34:22 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1065793973.716.12.camel@delleric>
• Organization: Expway
• References: <1065699722.2432.220.camel@m...> <1065793973.716.12.camel@delleric>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> Even though I can't offer the view of a W3C XML Schema implementer (whom
> I am not) and directly answer to your question, I haven't resisted
> developing the issue on xmlhack (http://xmlhack.com/read.php?item=2077).
> 
> To make it short, can't we take this opportunity to build a datatype
> system in which people could add their own primitive types?

Yes yes yes please. This would be most definitely useful.

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
Research Scientist, Expway      http://expway.com/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

• Follow-Ups:
  • XML Attributes versus .NET Attributes
    • From: "Dan Mabbutt" <Seigfried@m...>

• References:
  • fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML Schema Working Group
    • From: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@a...>
  • Re: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWorking Group
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML Schema WorkingGroup
• Next by Date: XML Attributes versus .NET Attributes
• Previous by thread: Re: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWorking Group
• Next by thread: XML Attributes versus .NET Attributes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread