Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 07:40, David Megginson wrote: > Rick Marshall writes: > > > that's what ibm said 20 years ago and every design since has had to > > cope with 640k base memory ranges and other "that'll be more than > > enough" decisions. > > I understand that argument well, but in this case, we're not talking > about limiting the overall length of XML documents. Let's try not to > imagine only the present, but the future as well -- can anyone make a > reasonable case for an XML element or attribute name longer than 4096 > characters (for example)? do you mean like once computer generated namespaces and random names get involved? i can see it happening within a few years. rick > > > All the best, > > > David > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
